Religious workers
seeking to temporarily enter the US to pursue work in their field are
likely to enter using the R nonimmigrant visa.
Who qualifies
for an R visa?
To qualify for an R
visa, the applicant must be
- A
minister,
- A
person working in a professional capacity in a religious
occupation or vocation, or
- A
person who works for a religious organization or an affiliate in a
religious occupation who has been a member of the religious group
for at least the two years immediately preceding the application.
What
is a “Religious Denomination”?
What
are examples of “Religious Occupations”?
A
religious occupation is an activity relating to “traditional
religious functions.” Examples
of religious occupations include liturgical workers, religious
instructors, religious counselors, cantors, workers in religious
hospitals or religious health care facilities, missionaries, religious
translators or religious broadcasters.
Maintenance workers, clerks and fundraisers who work for
religious institutions are not eligible under this category.
What
is a “Religious Vocation”?
A
religious vocation is defined as “a calling to religious life”.
This calling must be shown through the demonstration of
commitment to the religious denominations, such as taking vows.
Examples of this include nuns, monks, religious brothers and
sisters.
How
do I apply for an R visa?
This
is an unusual category. If an applicant is outside the US, he or she
can apply for an R-1 visa without prior USCIS approval.
The applicant can go to the appropriate consulate and present
the required evidence and be issued the visa on the spot.
If
a person is in the US and wishes to change from one nonimmigrant
category to R-1 status, an application must be made with the USCIS.
This is done by submitting Form I-129, the R Supplement and a
number of supporting documents showing eligibility for the category.
Also, extensions of stay in R-1 status are made on this form.
What
evidence needs to accompany an R visa application?
Among
the most important evidence that must be presented by the applicant is
documentation of the sponsoring religious group’s tax exempt status
or eligibility to receive tax exempt status in the US.
Under the Immigration
and Naturalization Act (INA) § 101(a)(15)(R) and 8 CFR § 214.2(r),
religious entities applying on behalf of religious workers must be
“exempt from taxation as organizations described in IRC § 501(c)(3)
as it relates to religious organizations.”
The regulations require these organizations show they either
are exempt under 501(c)(3) as a religious organization, such as a
church, or have the documentation required by the Internal Revenue
Service to be eligible for exemption as a religious organization under
501(c)(3). The
regulations include these two separate options because according to
IRS Tax Publication #1828, titled “Tax Guide for Churches and
Religious Organizations”, churches are considered automatically
exempt from taxation and are therefore not required to obtain a formal
501(c)(3) determination letter. Note that this requirement has been
the source of many problems recently regarding religious workers. The
Department of Homeland Security believes that there is considerable
fraud occurring in the religious worker category and has taken very
restrictive views on which institutions are eligible to apply for such
visas.
The
sponsoring organization also needs to submit a letter on behalf of the
R-1 visa holder. This
letter should outline the applicant’s two-year minimum membership,
including where that membership occurred, in or out of the US.
It should also include a statement that the foreign-based
religious group and the US based religious group for which the
applicant will work belong to the same denomination.
It must state the name and location of the organization in the
US for which the applicant will work. Finally,
it should outline the applicant’s qualifications and salary.
How
long can I have R status?
The
maximum stay in R-1 status is 5 years.
A person can obtain R-1 status again after remaining outside
the US for one year before making another application.
What visa
status would the spouse and children of an R-1 nonimmigrant receive?
Spouses
and children of R-1 nonimmigrants and classified as R-2. They are not
permitted to work unless they have their own work visas.
Are there any
differences between the special immigrant religious worker category
for green card applicants and R-1 non-immigrant visas?
The
most important difference between the two religious worker categories
is that the R-1 visa is temporary and the special immigrant religious
worker visa is permanent. An
applicant for a green card as a special immigrant religious worker
must have been working for
the religious group for at least two years prior to making the
application. This work may be done either in or out of the US. In most
cases where the work is done in the US, the person has been in the US
on an R-1 visa. Another
difference between the two is the forms involved.
A special immigrant
religious worker applies using Form I-360 in place of the I-129 and R
supplement.
The
evidence that should accompany the special immigrant religious worker
petition and the role of the beneficiary within the religious
organization are the same as for the R-1 applicant.
RECENT
DEVELOPMENTS
As
noted above, the R-1 visa category has been the source of considerable
tension recently. Immigration adjudicators have been interpreting
immigration regulations to require that a religious organization must
be classified as a church under IRC § 170(b)(1)(A)(i).
This trend was first seen in Administrative Appeals Office (AAO)
decisions in 2000, as reported by American Immigration Lawyers
Association (AILA) members. Similar
problems then began to show up at USCIS service centers.
If a religious organization could not demonstrate that it was a
church, the petition was denied.
In response to
complaints regarding the ‘church’ classification issue, the White
House held a meeting on December 9, 2003 with several religious
organizations. White
House representatives and the CIS General Counsel’s office agreed
that immigration regulations were being misinterpreted by
adjudicators. On December
17, 2003, USCIS Associate Director William R. Yates issued a
memorandum that made an attempt to rectify the situation.
The memo states that a religious organization classified as a
church under the IRC is only one method of demonstrating that the
petitioner is a qualifying religious organization.
The memo further states that organizations other than churches
can be considered qualifying organizations if it can be demonstrated
that their tax exemption is due to religious factors and that the
organizations are “organized for religious purposes and operate
under the principles of a particular faith, rather than solely for
education, charitable, scientific and other 501(c)(3) qualifying
factors.”
An additional
development is an Administrative
Appeals Office (AAO) decision dated April 20, 2004 that reversed a
Nebraska Service Center (NSC) decision denying a special immigrant
religious worker petition (I-360).
While the decision affected a religious immigrant worker, the
decision may positively affect decisions for religious nonimmigrant
workers (R-1) workers. In
its decision, the AAO pointed out that the NSC was incorrect in its
decision to deny the petition because of a lack of evidence
establishing that the organization was a “bona fide religious
organization as recognized by the IRS” as the petitioner had
submitted a second IRS letter that explicitly stated that the
petitioner was a religious organization.
The AAO also drew attention to portions of the IRS Publication
1828 that were submitted by the petitioner on appeal that pointed out
that the IRS does recognize religious organizations that are not
churches that may be tax-exempt under 501(c)(3).
The AAO stated, “Therefore, the petitioner has overcome the
finding of the [NSC] director that the petitioner is not a bona fide
nonprofit religious organization.”
The AAO concluded that the NSC’s determination that “only
churches qualify as religious organizations is overly broad and is,
therefore, withdrawn.”