|
THE
ABC'S OF IMMIGRATION - INADMISSIBILITY - SECURITY GROUNDS
US
immigration law makes a variety of security related concerns grounds
for inadmissibility. Over
the past ten years, there have been a number of changes in this area,
responding to changing world conditions.
Indeed, given the tragic events of last week, more changes in
this area should be expected in the near future.
If a consular officer or INS inspector either knows or has a
reasonable basis for believing that the applicant for admission is
seeking to enter the US to engage in espionage or sabotage, or to
obtain for export goods or technology that have been identified as not
for export, the applicant is to be denied admission.
One of the areas in which this ground is a particular concern
is that of foreign students coming to the US to study in a field
listed on the State Department’s Technology Alert List.
Visa applicants who seek to participate in such fields face
close scrutiny, and in most cases must obtain a security advisory
opinion from the State Department.
Such opinions are required for nationals of countries that
sponsor terrorism. There
are no waivers for this ground of inadmissibility except for cases
dealing with export control issues.
Foreign nationals are also inadmissible for terrorist activities.
Specifically, a person is inadmissible if they have engaged in
terrorist activities, if a consular officer or INS inspector knows or
has reason to believe that the person is currently or will in the
future engage in terrorist activities, if the person has incited
terrorist activity, or if the person is a representative or member of
a terrorist organization designated by the State Department.
Under the current rules for designating a terrorist organization,
three elements must be present. The
organization must be based in a foreign country, it must engage in
terrorist activity, which is defined to include hijacking and
sabotage, kidnapping if done to force government action,
assassination, use of biological, chemical or nuclear devices, or an
explosive or firearm with the intent to endanger people or property,
and threatening or conspiring to do any of these things, and the
organization must threaten US security.
Even if it has been years since the organization engaged in
terrorist activities, it may still be considered a terrorist
organization if it retains the capacity and inclination to engage in
terrorism.
In the past, the State Department has instructed consular officers to
“err on the side of caution” in dealing with applications that
might be denied on terrorist grounds.
Whether this remains the case in the future, however, remains
to be seen.
If the State Department determines that a person’s entry to the US
would have adverse consequences on US foreign policy, the person is
inadmissible. There are
two exceptions to this rule. First,
the ground of inadmissibility does not apply to officials of a foreign
government simply because of statements they may have made.
In these cases, the person is admissible only if their
admission would create a “clear negative foreign policy impact”.
Second, a person cannot be deemed inadmissible because of past
statements that would be legal in the US unless their entry would
compromise competing US foreign policy interests.
Membership in a communist or other totalitarian party makes a person
inadmissible, but there are a number of exceptions to this rule.
The primary exception eliminates membership that was
involuntary, while under age 16, automatic by operation of law or
necessary to obtain a job from the basis for inadmissibility.
Another exception applies to people who have renounced their
membership in the party at least two years prior to the visa
application admissible if it is determined that they are not a threat
to the US. If the
person’s country is still controlled by a communist or totalitarian
government, the renunciation must have occurred at least five years
prior to the visa application. Finally,
people who are close family members of US citizens and permanent
residents are eligible for a waiver of this ground of inadmissibility.
The last security related ground of inadmissibility applies to people
who were participants in Nazi era persecutions and those who have
engaged in genocide.
|